Tuesday , October 4 2022

The 4 biggest problems with "fantastic beasts: the crimes of Grindelwald"



[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "

Ezra Miller at the premiere of "Fantastic Beasts: The Crime of Grindelwald". (Photo by Joel C Ryan / Invision / AP)

Spoilers in front of "fantastic beast 2"

Prequels on favorite blockbusters are much harder to get out of the sequels. the magic and the mystery of a galaxy far and far away, and the Middle Earth faded a little while sitting in their inflated history. & nbsp;

The clean schedules become full, new holes open up and weak history complemented by fan service: "Do you remember these characters? Well, they are really connected in a way that you never knew, but for some reason is not recognized later. "

We are just two movies in, but so far, it Fantastic beasts franchise commits every prequel sin that can imagine, steadily removing magic from the world of magic.

Here are the four biggest problems with Fantastic beast: The crimes of Grindelwald:

There is no protagonist

Newt Scamander may be the face of the franchise, but he is certainly not the protagonist of this story – he is a random attendant with few reasons to remain, except the fact that the series started with him.

Belief is, in many ways, our new Harry Potter. an orphan messiah, simply waiting to apply his great destiny. It has always been featured as the biggest piece in the chessboard, fought by the big players Grindelwald and Dumbledore. How he chooses to use his powers on which side he chooses to play is the most important decision in this story with a wide margin, much more than what Newt does with his cozy creatures.

It is Luke Skywalker, Frodo Baggins, the guy who either turns to the dark side or embraces the light. the destiny of every man in the world of magic is in his hands. Well, why is it so incredibly incredible?

Well, it may be the lack of expressions of Ezra Miller. Or it could be the fact that we have absolutely no idea who this person is except the fact that his oppressed powers are supposed to reflect the gay wrestling.

This, and his constant identity crises, make it a character always called who he is, instead of showing the audience a taste of personality. It's very hard to care about this character, especially because it always competes with Newt for screen time.

There are too many characters

Speaking of gay wardrobes, what is the deal with Dumbledore? It was the best part of this film, by far, and its difficulty is so interesting. Imagine being in love with the leader of a fascist movement! This is an awesome thing that happens to anyone, and it would make a great movie, one day. The next time, maybe? Or after that?

There are too many characters that crawl around the screen here, and those who take most of the screen are the least likely to follow, and the least interesting. In the heart, this is really the story of Dumbledore vs. Grindelwald, and their live pawn, Credence.

All the others are much less important and should be set on the sidelines, especially because we know little about them. Avengers: War of Infinity could justify placing so many characters on the screen because we see them growing up for a decade. Harry Potter did the same.

Two movies in, the Fantastic beasts cast has expanded into Newt, Tina, Jacob, Queenie, Credence, Leta Lestrange, Thesee Scamander, Dumbledore, and Grindelwald. And Nagini, for some reason.

We do not have time for this. The characters do not have time for it – they have just been given the opportunity to show up, this and the decisions they make often come together as impulsive, even accidental (Queenie's sudden change of heart is the worst example of this).

The tone is everywhere

When it started this franchise, it seemed to be a charming story of an introvert addicted to its animals and its hedgehogs. Aww – can not even make contact with the eyes. What a sweetheart. But then, RACISM.

OPA, what? Suddenly, Newt Scamander, the guy who wrote the book about magic creatures, is sucked into a massive, not consuming, allegory of Hitler. What does the good have to do with fantastic beasts?

We've already gone through this with Voldemort, remember? Why, J.K. Rowling, did you have to bring your fine social comment to that? I have already done so, and it was good. this time, I just wanted to watch a well-dressed snarling animal around.

And there is still a lot, but they are confused with scenes with dead infants, a baby that has changed, a choked baby, fascist speeches, a smoky smoke that turns into a damn Holocaust and a woman who ends up a day of beheaded snake.

Choose a tone – we will all follow the story you choose. But you have to choose one.

Fascist transportation is awkward

I have a treacherous suspicion that the reason this franchise has turned into "Fantastic Beast and the rise of fascism" is because J.K. Rowling spends a lot of time on Twitter, protesting with the troops for Trump and Brexit.

Whether it is true does not matter, because the issue has become so topical. People are being pushed into political extremism today, so it is important to give the world a story that reflects this. Except, Fantastic beasts does not do a really good job.

Grindelwald does not really act like a fascist leader. he is not a demagogue or seductive speaker. It just walks gaps, killing people. There are no Mussolini / Hitler rallies that gush up crowds of simple folk in blood – just empty glances and strange eyes.

At one point, he hugs a lizard and suddenly throws it out of the window, in a scene that caused loud laughter in my movie theater. The one who attracts the fans? How?

One speech he gave said the real tragedy of World War II and the Holocaust, and he used these upcoming horrors to recruit the magicians to fight the flies. And for some reason, it worked. Even Queenie, the magician who wants to marry a maggole, suddenly decides that joining a big-hate group is a great idea.

This could have been a very strong moment if an analogy had been given to join the ranks of a magical racist. Ordinary people are recovering into hateful ideologies, making Queenie's story one of the most interesting, potentially.

The incredibly controlled energies to Jacob show that it goes under a dark road, but it certainly is not enough to justify joining the Grindelwald ranks.

Now, there are many chances that this franchise will turn around; there are still three movies to go to, and that's more than enough time to tell a stunning story. But I do not think Newt should be part of it anymore – it just adds to clutter.

After all, there are only so many times you can fly a cryptoologist in a race.

">

Ezra Miller at the premiere of "Fantastic Beasts: The Crime of Grindelwald". (Photo by Joel C Ryan / Invision / AP)

Spoilers in front of "fantastic beast 2"

Prequels on favorite blockbusters are much harder to get out of the sequels. the magic and the mystery of a galaxy far and far away, and the Middle Earth faded a little while sitting in their inflated history.

The clean schedules become full, new holes open up and weak history complemented by fan service: "Do you remember these characters? Well, they are really connected in a way that you never knew, but for some reason is not recognized later. "

We are just two movies in, but so far, it Fantastic beasts franchise commits every prequel sin that can imagine, steadily removing magic from the world of magic.

Here are the four biggest problems with Fantastic beast: The crimes of Grindelwald:

There is no protagonist

Newt Scamander may be the face of the franchise, but he is certainly not the protagonist of this story – he is a random attendant with few reasons to remain, except the fact that the series started with him.

Belief is, in many ways, our new Harry Potter. an orphan messiah, simply waiting to apply his great destiny. It has always been featured as the biggest piece in the chessboard, fought by the big players Grindelwald and Dumbledore. How he chooses to use his powers on which side he chooses to play is the most important decision in this story with a wide margin, much more than what Newt does with his cozy creatures.

It is Luke Skywalker, Frodo Baggins, the guy who either turns to the dark side or embraces the light. the destiny of every man in the world of magic is in his hands. Well, why is it so incredibly incredible?

Well, it may be the lack of expressions of Ezra Miller. Or it could be the fact that we have absolutely no idea who this person is except the fact that his oppressed powers are supposed to reflect the gay wrestling.

This, and his constant identity crises, make it a character always called who he is, instead of showing the audience a taste of personality. It's very hard to care about this character, especially because it always competes with Newt for screen time.

There are too many characters

Speaking of gay wardrobes, what is the deal with Dumbledore? It was the best part of this film, by far, and its difficulty is so interesting. Imagine being in love with the leader of a fascist movement! This is an awesome thing that happens to anyone, and it would make a great movie, one day. The next time, maybe? Or after that?

There are too many characters that crawl around the screen here, and those who take most of the screen are the least likely to follow, and the least interesting. In the heart, this is really the story of Dumbledore vs. Grindelwald, and their live pawn, Credence.

All the others are much less important and should be set on the sidelines, especially because we know little about them. Avengers: War of Infinity could justify placing so many characters on the screen because we see them growing up for a decade. Harry Potter did the same.

Two movies in, the Fantastic beasts cast has expanded into Newt, Tina, Jacob, Queenie, Credence, Leta Lestrange, Thesee Scamander, Dumbledore, and Grindelwald. And Nagini, for some reason.

We do not have time for this. The characters do not have time for it – they have just been given the opportunity to show up, this and the decisions they make often come together as impulsive, even accidental (Queenie's sudden change of heart is the worst example of this).

The tone is everywhere

When it started this franchise, it seemed to be a charming story of an introvert addicted to its animals and its hedgehogs. Aww – can not even make contact with the eyes. What a sweetheart. But then, RACISM.

OPA, what? Suddenly, Newt Scamander, the guy who wrote the book about magic creatures, is sucked into a massive, not consuming, allegory of Hitler. What does the good have to do with fantastic beasts?

We've already gone through this with Voldemort, remember? Why, J.K. Rowling, did you have to bring your fine social comment to that? I have already done so, and it was good. this time, I just wanted to watch a well-dressed snarling animal around.

And there is still a lot, but they are confused with scenes with dead infants, a baby that has changed, a choked baby, fascist speeches, a smoky smoke that turns into a damn Holocaust and a woman who ends up a day of beheaded snake.

Choose a tone – we will all follow the story you choose. But you have to choose one.

Fascist transportation is awkward

I have a treacherous suspicion that the reason this franchise has turned into "Fantastic Beast and the rise of fascism" is because J.K. Rowling spends a lot of time on Twitter, protesting with the troops for Trump and Brexit.

Whether it is true does not matter, because the issue has become so topical. People are being pushed into political extremism today, so it is important to give the world a story that reflects this. Except, Fantastic beasts does not do a really good job.

Grindelwald does not really act like a fascist leader. he is not a demagogue or seductive speaker. It just walks gaps, killing people. There are no Mussolini / Hitler rallies that gush up crowds of simple folk in blood – just empty glances and strange eyes.

At one point, he hugs a lizard and suddenly throws it out of the window, in a scene that caused loud laughter in my movie theater. The one who attracts the fans? How?

One speech he gave said the real tragedy of World War II and the Holocaust, and he used these upcoming horrors to recruit the magicians to fight the flies. And for some reason, it worked. Even Queenie, the magician who wants to marry a maggole, suddenly decides that joining a big-hate group is a great idea.

This could have been a very strong moment if an analogy had been given to join the ranks of a magical racist. Ordinary people are recovering into hateful ideologies, making Queenie's story one of the most interesting, potentially.

The incredibly controlled energies to Jacob show that it goes under a dark road, but it certainly is not enough to justify joining the Grindelwald ranks.

Now, there are many chances that this franchise will turn around; there are still three movies to go to, and that's more than enough time to tell a stunning story. But I do not think Newt should be part of it anymore – it just adds to clutter.

After all, there are only so many times you can fly a cryptoologist in a race.

[ad_2]
Source link